+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Police Officers file Federal Lawsuit: Allege Racketeering; Corruption

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,835
    Blog Entries
    5
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    1

    Default Police Officers file Federal Lawsuit: Allege Racketeering; Corruption

    On Tuesday, November 10, Kokomo Police Officers Jeff Kirk and Greg Davis filed an explosive lawsuit in U.S. Federal Court (Indianapolis) alleging Kokomo's Mayor, City Attorney, Police Chief, and two other officers engaged in corruption and racketeering as defined by U.S. Law (R.I.C.O. Act).

    Defendants named in the lawsuit include the City of Kokomo, the Kokomo Police Department, KPD Chief Rob Baker, KPD Professional Standards Officer David Mitchell, KPD Sergeant Mark Miller, City Attorney Derek Sublette, and Mayor Greg Goodnight.

    The individuals named are being sued both in their official capacities and personally.

    Under Civil Violation provisions of the Federal RICO Act, Plaintiffs are entitled to recover triple damages if they are successful in Court.

    In the lawsuit Complaint, the Plaintiffs allege Goodnight, Baker, Mitchell, Miller and Sublette committed numerous criminal acts.

    You can see the entire complaint by clicking here.

    NIK

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,835
    Blog Entries
    5
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    1

    Default

    Since posting this article 45 minutes ago, I've received nearly a dozen requests for more information.

    I would refer interested parties to our series of articles last summer titled 'A Question of Justice'.

    It's a much more thorough examination of the events which led to this lawsuit. You should read all five articles.

    Click here.

    NIK

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the land of confusion
    Posts
    18,863
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    RICO is a very serious thing. Not good to be charged with it. You can quickly end up being Bubba's "buddy" for decades.

    They use that charge to knock out mobsters, drug lords, big time financial con artists, terrorists, etc.

    It will be fun to watch this unfold. Pigs squealing on other pigs. LOL j/k. Don't get your jack boots in a wad.

    Hopefully true justice will prevail.
    When fools meddle in power, evil events accelerate.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,835
    Blog Entries
    5
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    1

    Default

    The follies continue....

    Before Kirk and Davis were suing KPD Sgt. Mark Miller... Miller was suing the same officers as well as the Sheriff and one of his Deputies.

    A Federal Judge in Indianapolis summarily dismissed Mark Miller's lawsuit on December 2... basically telling him to return to State Court if he wanted to continue.

    We have the Judgement: Click here.

    Summary in (KPD) MARK MILLER - PLAINTIFF

    vs.

    (KPD) Greg Davis, (KPD) Jeff Kirk, (KPD) John Doe, (Sheriff's Department) Matthew Roberson and (Sheriff's Department) Marshall Talbert - DEFENDANTS

    The Court having granted judgment on the pleadings in favor of the Defendants, judgment is hereby ENTERED in favor of the Defendants and against the Plaintiff on all of the Plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In the absence of any remaining federal claim, the Court declines to continue to exercise jurisdiction over the supplemental state law claims asserted by the Plaintiff; accordingly, those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
    It sure looks like Kirk and Davis' own Federal lawsuit may have some teeth to it... now.

    NIK

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    in the land of confusion
    Posts
    18,863
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    0

    Default

    January 21, 2010

    Ind. Decisions - Court of Appeals issues 2 today (and 3 NFP)

    For publication opinions today (2):

    In Gregory Davis and Jeffrey Kirk v. City of Kokomo, Indiana, a 27-page opinion, Judge Darden writes:

    Gregory Davis and Jeffrey Kirk appeal the trial court’s order affirming in part the findings of the Kokomo Board of Public Works and Safety (“Board”) that they had committed violations that warranted disciplinary action. We affirm.

    Issues: 1. Whether the trial court erred in deferring to the Board’s construction of the Kokomo Police Department’s general orders and collective bargaining agreement and affirming in part the Board’s findings. 2. Whether the Board’s decision was improperly influenced by ex parte information and pressure from the local administration.
    When fools meddle in power, evil events accelerate.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2,835
    Blog Entries
    5
    Downloads
    0
    Uploads
    1

    Default

    We have the State Appeals Court Decision.

    Click here to see a copy.

    I don't agree with most of it, but the Court of Appeals (like Judge Murray) must give some lee-way to the Kokomo Board of Works processes.

    Too bad, I suppose. But then again, this case is exactly what Federal Civil Rights (and RICO) actions were designed to correct.

    It will get interesting....

    NIK

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts